US Vice President JD Vance has ignited criticism in Britain and France after questioning the effectiveness of a planned European peacekeeping force in Ukraine, dismissing it as “20,000 troops from some random country that hasn’t fought a war in 30 or 40 years.” His remarks, made during a Fox News interview, were widely seen as a slight against the UK and France, both of which have pledged troops for the proposed force.
Vance later denied he was referring to Britain or France, insisting he never named any country specifically. However, British and French officials—along with military veterans—rejected that explanation, pointing to both nations’ combat records in Iraq and Afghanistan alongside the US.
Why it matters:
Vance’s remarks have strained relations with two of the US’s closest allies at a time when cooperation on European security is critical. The UK and France have positioned themselves as key players in a potential Ukraine peacekeeping force, and British Prime Minister Keir Starmer has emphasized the need for a coalition to ensure stability in the region.
The controversy also underscores the Trump administration’s shifting approach to European security. While Vance promoted an economic deal with Ukraine as a superior alternative to a military presence, European leaders insist that peacekeeping troops are necessary to deter further Russian aggression.
What they’re saying:
Nigel Farage, leader of Reform UK and a Trump ally: “JD Vance is wrong. Wrong, wrong, wrong. We stood by America all through those 20 years putting in exactly the same contribution.”
James Cartlidge, UK Conservative Party defense spokesperson: “It’s deeply disrespectful to ignore such service and sacrifice.”
French Defense Minister Sébastien Lecornu: “We respect the veterans of all allied countries. We will make sure our own veterans are respected.”
Johnny Mercer, British veteran and former defense minister: Called Vance a “clown” for dismissing Britain’s military contributions.
Meanwhile, Vance doubled down on social media, stating, “I don’t even mention the UK or France in the clip, both of whom have fought bravely alongside the US over the last 20 years, and beyond.”
Between the lines:
Vance’s comments come amid broader tensions between the US and its European allies over military commitments. The Trump administration has signaled a reluctance to engage in prolonged security guarantees, instead pushing for economic partnerships—such as a US-Ukraine mineral deal—as a deterrent against Russian aggression.
Starmer and French President Emmanuel Macron continue to advocate for a Nato-backed European security presence, emphasizing that US support, even if indirect, remains vital.
What’s next
While Vance attempted to walk back his remarks, the damage may linger. The UK and France are likely to press Washington for reassurances about its commitment to European security. Meanwhile, the White House is expected to clarify its stance on the peacekeeping force and how it aligns with Trump’s push for an economic security strategy in Ukraine.
(With inputs from agencies)
This article was originally published by a timesofindia.indiatimes.com . Read the Original article here. .